Garcia 02/19/1969
Matrix, San Francisco, CA
Source Summary
sdb>Mreel>???>Dat>CD any info help send to usalai@nycap.rr.com and or jerrylives2000@aol.com ripped by Mike Lai and seeded to etree jan 28, 2001 via jerrylives2000.etree.org filler 2-94 garcia, grisman and rice: Shady groove studio sessions
sdb>Mreel>???>Dat>CD any info help send to usalai@nycap.rr.com and or jerrylives2000@aol.com ripped by Mike Lai and seeded to etree jan 28, 2001 via jerrylives2000.etree.org filler 2-94 garcia, grisman and rice: Shady groove studio sessions
Other Sources
SHNID 4500 Garcia, Nelson et al; via Teddy GoodBear to...
SHNID 6390 High County(Garcia & Nelson Sitting in):SBD>...
SHNID 20918 Jerry Garcia (banjo), David Nelson, and Frank...
SHNID 35270 High Country w/ Garcia & Nelson: MSR > ? > DAT...
SHNID 82039 High Country w/ Garcia & Nelson: SBD (orAUD?) >...
SHNID 102796 High Country: SBD > Master Reel > Reel > DAT >...
SHNID 113810 MR(Bill Abrams)>R@7.5 ips.(Peter Kafer)>R@ 7.5...
SHNID 135007 High Country; flac1644; Goodbear 3rd remaster...
SHNID 150685 High Country: SBD > Master Reel > Reel > Dat;...
SHNID 4500 Garcia, Nelson et al; via Teddy GoodBear to...
SHNID 6390 High County(Garcia & Nelson Sitting in):SBD>...
SHNID 20918 Jerry Garcia (banjo), David Nelson, and Frank...
SHNID 35270 High Country w/ Garcia & Nelson: MSR > ? > DAT...
SHNID 82039 High Country w/ Garcia & Nelson: SBD (orAUD?) >...
SHNID 102796 High Country: SBD > Master Reel > Reel > DAT >...
SHNID 113810 MR(Bill Abrams)>R@7.5 ips.(Peter Kafer)>R@ 7.5...
SHNID 135007 High Country; flac1644; Goodbear 3rd remaster...
SHNID 150685 High Country: SBD > Master Reel > Reel > Dat;...
Jerry Garcia w/ Sandy Rothman & Dave Nelson 2-19-64
sdb>Mreel>???>Dat>CD
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
filler 2-94 garcia, grisman and rice: Shady groove studio sessions
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
any info help send to usalai@nycap.rr.com and or jerrylives2000@aol.com
ripped by Mike Lai and seeded to etree jan 28, 2001 via jerrylives2000.etree.org
sdb>Mreel>???>Dat>CD
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
filler 2-94 garcia, grisman and rice: Shady groove studio sessions
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
any info help send to usalai@nycap.rr.com and or jerrylives2000@aol.com
ripped by Mike Lai and seeded to etree jan 28, 2001 via jerrylives2000.etree.org
Comments
Other Sources (comments)
Garcia, Nelson et al; via... (1)
High County(Garcia & Nelson... (1)
Jerry Garcia (banjo), David... (1)
High Country w/ Garcia &... (2)
High Country w/ Garcia &... (0)
High Country: SBD > Master... (0)
MR(Bill Abrams)>R@7.5... (0)
High Country; flac1644;... (0)
High Country: SBD > Master... (0)
Garcia, Nelson et al; via... (1)
High County(Garcia & Nelson... (1)
Jerry Garcia (banjo), David... (1)
High Country w/ Garcia &... (2)
High Country w/ Garcia &... (0)
High Country: SBD > Master... (0)
MR(Bill Abrams)>R@7.5... (0)
High Country; flac1644;... (0)
High Country: SBD > Master... (0)
Date: 10/26/2002
User:
Joe Jupille
I added this user-submitted .shn set because it is in circulation and because it could well be the proper date, but I suspect that this might be the same material that circulates with the date 2/19/69. If anyone with this .shn set can provide a setlist, that would be very helpful in figuring out whether the material is the same.
Date: 10/27/2002
User:
Matt Vernon
It would be helpful if the people that submit shn sets supply a track list that
a). is internally consistent with the shn set submitted (number of tracks)
b). track song names or a statement why they aren't included
c). a statement if the tracks are knwon to be cut on sector boundaries (i.e. shntool was run and confirms no sector boundary errors)
d). a list of flaws that would be noticed by someone who listened to the tracks
e). a list of track and total disk times so that people that don't have the shns can compare their audio track times to see if they might have audio disks from the source used in the shn encoding
When these guidelines aren't followed in my experience eventually someone else will supply a second shn set which follows more of these guidelines which is then the preferred set.
There is so much music circulating especially for Jerry and the Grateful Dead that the slight delay in doing a marginally better job is worth it since it avoids an unnecessary upgrade cycle.
a). is internally consistent with the shn set submitted (number of tracks)
b). track song names or a statement why they aren't included
c). a statement if the tracks are knwon to be cut on sector boundaries (i.e. shntool was run and confirms no sector boundary errors)
d). a list of flaws that would be noticed by someone who listened to the tracks
e). a list of track and total disk times so that people that don't have the shns can compare their audio track times to see if they might have audio disks from the source used in the shn encoding
When these guidelines aren't followed in my experience eventually someone else will supply a second shn set which follows more of these guidelines which is then the preferred set.
There is so much music circulating especially for Jerry and the Grateful Dead that the slight delay in doing a marginally better job is worth it since it avoids an unnecessary upgrade cycle.
Date: 11/20/2003
User:
Gary Field
The tunes on this disc are the same as those that circulate on 2-19-69.
Date: 01/30/2004
User:
Lewis/Klitschko
Let's be honest.
This is 2/19/69, isn't it?
This is 2/19/69, isn't it?
Date: 01/31/2004
User:
Joe Jupille
Probably, certainly probably the same as what circulates as 2/19/69. But since I don't know of any hard evidence linking the material circulating with that date to that date, this remains speculation, I'd say.
Date: 02/01/2004
User:
Joe Jupille
BTW, as usual the Jerry Site provides some very useful information about this performance. Seems pretty likely that it's 2/19/69, based on this.
Date: 02/02/2004
User:
hanno
and '2-19-69' is a misdate as the grateful dead performed on that date. just to confuse you ;)
Date: 02/02/2004
User:
Joe Jupille
So it would seem for Deadlists. We should all probably file this one in the 'uncertain' category unless something more definitive turns up, but continue to use the conventional 2/19/69 dating. That's what I plan to do, anyway.
Date: 12/24/2004
User:
XDennis Carter
I'am sure Sandy Rothman, or David Nelson, could help clear up this confusion over the dates in question. 1964 seems entirely likely, as Jerry was playing acousticly during this time. 1969 was an experimental period, with electric instruments & alot of studio time, spent working on the upcoming LP.
In my experience, no matter how "in question" a "date" may be, one must have a little faith in what was written down, all those years ago. My vote is for the 1964 date.
In my experience, no matter how "in question" a "date" may be, one must have a little faith in what was written down, all those years ago. My vote is for the 1964 date.
Date: 12/25/2004
User:
Joe Jupille
It was 1969.
Date: 03/16/2008
User:
sotm53092
both 2-19-64(35270) and 2-19-69(12686) share the same md5's
Add Show
Comments
Source Collectors
Related Artist Sources
History
Add Comment