Loading...

Phish 02/26/2003

Worcester Centrum Centre, Worcester, MA
SHNID 15784
Source Summary
AKG 393 > MP2 > D7 (DFC, 20cm @60deg); D7 > Edirol UA-1D > CDWav > mkwACT > SHN; Taped and transfered by Brian Costigan; Seeded by Brian Costigan and Greg Bloch; Note: this is the same mic source as this seed but is a lossless transfer
Entered by Matt Vernon
Checksums shn-md5, st5, ffp
Disc Counts 2 / 3
Media Size
Date Circulated
Date Added
3/10/03
03/10/2003
Downloads Download Text | Download Zip
Archive Identifier phish2003-02-26.015784.worcester.ck93.akg300.costigan.flac1644 ↗

Other Sources
SHNID 15571 AKG 393 > MP2 > D7 (DFC); OGG > SHN; Note: this...
SHNID 15955 Schoeps CMC6/mk41v > Lunatec V2 > AD2K+ >...
SHNID 74171 Schoeps mk41 > kc5 > cmc6 > Sonosax SX-M2 >...
SHNID 165868 flac24 48kHz ; Schoeps mk41 > KC5 > CMC6 >...
Phish
2/26/2003
The Centrum Center, Worcester, MA

Source: DFC 20cm @ 60 degrees AKG 393s -> Mp2 -> D7
Transfer: D7 -> Edirol UA-1D -> CDWav -> mkw -> shn
Recorded and transfered by Brian Costigan (phatphiles@metrocast.net)
Seeded by Brian Costigan and Greg Bloch

Disk 1
Set 1

1: You ENjoy Myself
2: Clone
3: Roggae
4: Drifting
5: Blue Skies
6: The Moma Dance
7: Final Flight

Disk 2
1: Maze
Set 2
2: Stash
3: Ghost ->
4: Makisupa Policeman ->
5: Ya Mar

Disk 3
1: Guyute
2: Waves
3: Prince Caspian ->
4: Frankenstein
5: Golgi Apparatus
Encore
6: Crowd
7: Loving Cup




Comments

Date: 04/04/2003
User: oyster
I have seen this same source circulate in FLAC format quite often. I have it in FLAC and was wondering if anyone can verify the correct FLAC fingerprint. I will post my FLAC fingerprint for reference:

ph2003-02-26d1t1.flac:e06aedf3148eee09a511c5478869f049
ph2003-02-26d1t2.flac:b77dfe7e9994885a86cc1beb8e9e5ad6
ph2003-02-26d1t3.flac:5e49a343f43738caf42546f33fdf68cd
ph2003-02-26d1t4.flac:045f9d48e69b6b6eec7a086a0e340a26
ph2003-02-26d1t5.flac:e434390d50a2fbce9160ca175b213934
ph2003-02-26d1t6.flac:c116bce7942a4ae6e08e0bc0fa036302
ph2003-02-26d1t7.flac:11e2d05452345dd3615177296b472abf
ph2003-02-26d2t1.flac:0e8392efd252e64a67dc41ffbb8749dd
ph2003-02-26d2t2.flac:d78f294b10fcaebbdeb40e89cdb6a62f
ph2003-02-26d2t3.flac:22676e1a7d18ff85da4ca21dff0a6d59
ph2003-02-26d2t4.flac:d4b5c710a1cbf298144c10776c7cc93c
ph2003-02-26d2t5.flac:f8aa9c4b7c4bee767fa488f0feb28322
ph2003-02-26d3t1.flac:9c600de7a9b3ed542158de2a577e1c42
ph2003-02-26d3t2.flac:55e0d03ce21727e09a815f526686a715
ph2003-02-26d3t3.flac:8bf2d13af6d87eb2d86379a77efcde24
ph2003-02-26d3t4.flac:bb0ebc15cee6582c843a16959133180d
ph2003-02-26d3t5.flac:9364a728d57cd201f106f89441af5d66
ph2003-02-26d3t6.flac:dfa93e0e3d3f1fe5b66b5526efd294f0
ph2003-02-26d3t7.flac:4539921981c803c9792e8934932455c3
Date: 04/04/2003
I thought that the edirol ua-1d (like all edirol products) unnecessarily resamples, making this a lossy transfer as well. ???
Date: 03/17/2004
User: twatts
That is correct, Edirols are known to be INACCURATE for digi to digi transfers. It is unfortunate, tehy are great pieces of gear! I have a UA-5. Perhaps Brian could retransfer his seed one day.

Terry