Loading...

Grateful Dead 06/28/1969

Veterans Auditorium, Santa Rosa, CA
SHNID 20548
Source Summary
SBD> MR> Cassette> DAT> DAT; DAT> ZA2> Soundforge> wav> mkw> SHN; DAT seed provided by Michael P. Weitzman; Transfer and SHN by Joe Samaritano
Entered by dr.unclear
Checksums shn-md5, st5
Disc Counts 1 / 1
Media Size
Date Circulated
Date Added
11/10/2003
09/22/2004
Downloads Download Text | Download Zip
Archive Identifier gd69-06-28.sbd.samaritano.20548.sbeok.shnf ↗

Other Sources
SHNID 3300 complete; sbd> mr> cass> dat> cd; Conversion:...
SHNID 166577 flac16 ; Recording info: SBD master reel > DAT...
6/28/69 - Grateful Dead
Veterans Auditorium, Santa Rosa, CA.

Lineage:
Soundboard->Master Reel->Cassette->DAT->DAT

Transfer:
DAT->ZA2->Soundforge->.wav->mkw->SHN

DAT seed provided by Michael P. Weitzman
Transfer and SHN by Joe Samaritano
11/10/2003

Disc 1:
d1t01 - Slewfoot
d1t02 - Silver Threads
d1t03 - Mama Tried
d1t04 - MAMU
d1t05 - Doin' That Rag
d1t06 - High Time
d1t07 - King Bee
d1t08 - Top Of The World
d1t09 - Lovelight



Notes:
1. Known low generation lineage and transfer info.
2. Splice in Lovelight about 20 minutes in.
3. Garcia on Pedal Steel for Slewfoot and Silver Threads.
Peter Grant on Banjo and Marmaduke on backup vocals for MAMU.

Comments

Date: 11/14/2003
User: dms
what was soundforge used for? hopefully, resampling only...
Date: 11/15/2003
User: Hanno
Can someone comment on how this seed compares to the CDRs that have been around for years? Thanks.
Date: 11/15/2003
Soundforge is used as a recording device from the DAT machine to the hard drive, nothing more.
Date: 11/15/2003
I don't know how they compare, because I don't have time to listen through them side by side. I do know that the lineage is low gen and true, and I always go for the seeds closest to the source if I can. That's just me and my obsession, others may not care. I'm just sharin' some tunes...
Date: 11/15/2003
User: hanno
I'm just asking because, well, it might be worth getting if there was any improvement over the old version. If not, it's just added redundancy.
Date: 11/15/2003
I'd rather have a SHN set created from a low gen DAT rather than an EAC of a CD or a lineage with ?'s in it, so I guess these are for lineage freaks only.
Date: 11/15/2003
User: danlynch
This shn set is most definitely an upgrade over previous sources. Besides the avoidance of an unnecessary EAC step that Joe refers to, there is also clearly less hiss in this version and definitive source information. There are quite a few DAT sources out there that just haven't reached the shn stage (like for instance the 'new' clearly upgraded 4/27/77 that Joe did a couple of weeks ago), and Joe should be saluted for putting the work into getting them out there.
Date: 11/16/2003
User: hanno
OK, thanks to Joe, Dan and all involved! great to hear that :-)
Date: 04/06/2004
User: C Miller
Actually, this version has slightly MORE hiss than the previous one, but it sounds like it might be because the previous version had some NR applied at some point. Ths hiss isn't obtrusive (i.e., you can only hear it between songs for the most part) and as a result this one sounds a little brighter. Also, the channels are switched on this version.